Textile Processing – How disruptive innovation can pave the way to a sustainable fashion supply chain | Part II

This article is the third in a three-part series based on our Textile Processing Guide.
Image by Lydia Nada. 

19 JULY 2023


Although great progress has been made when it comes to innovation in sustainable chemistry there are still a number of hazardous chemicals which can be found on ZDHC’s RSL and MRSL lists to which no similar performing, less harmful alternative has yet been found. As such, disruptive innovation in this space mostly focuses on finding competitive alternatives that could either replace a specific chemical in a solution or by replacing a solution with a new formulation. Examples of this could include formulations that are bio-based or based on a non-harmful chemistry like silicone. 

The figure below shows an overview of the disruptive technologies and innovators. 




Chemistry innovations in pretreatment are more limited than in dyeing and finishing. An example of an incremental innovation in this space is cationic treatment. With this treatment, cotton is modified to have a permanent cationic, or positive charge, making the cotton “friendlier” to dye and so increases its dye uptake. Cationic treatments have the opportunity to enhance the dyeability of cotton but require advanced effluent treatment as they can cause eutrophication.

Nano Dye
Nano dye has a salt-free cationic treatment that potentially does not result in high eutrophication. Salt is commonly used in the pretreatment process which then ends up in the effluent water, impacting the local environment. Nano Dye’s technology is a drop-in solution that changes the charge of a cotton molecule to the opposite charge of the dye to enhance dye uptake. It is used with cotton, other cellulosic fibres and blends.


Conventional scouring is harsh on fabrics and the environment. Enzymes can be used to modify the fabric to become more receptive to dyes through processes such as bioscouring, they can be used in both pretreatment and finishing1. It is a more sustainable solution that allows savings in water, time and energy as well as a reduction in the usage of harmful chemicals which improves worker safety.

Novozymes produces and develops biological solutions for textiles including enzymatic scouring, also known as biopreparation or bioscouring.

Fermentech Labs
Fermentech Labs processes agricultural waste in a novel SSF bioreactor through which the cellulosic parts are pretreated & processed by proprietary microbes to produce enzymes such as cellulase, amylase and pectinase for applications like bio-polishing, desizing and bio-scouring.



Natural dyes and pigments, from sources like algae and plants, have existed for centuries but have historically been overlooked by the fashion industry due to inferior performance, limited colour palette and higher prices than synthetic dyes. However, new disruptive cultivation, extraction and application processes have the potential to overcome these barriers and enable the (re)implementation of natural dyes at scale. Using natural dyes and pigments enables a shift away from synthetic chemistry and in some instances the feedstock used ie: plants, algae or waste means the dyes and pigments have the potential to be carbon negative.

What is the difference between a dye and a pigment? 

  • Dyes are water soluble – like salt in water – and so can penetrate into a material and be held within it by chemical forces.
  • Pigments are water insoluble – like sand in water – they must be dispersed in a binder and are applied to the surface of the material. 



Stony Creek Colors*
Stony Creek Colors creates a pre-reduced plant-based indigo that can replace petrochemical based synthetic indigo dyes. They optimise indigo production in a renewable (and aniline – free) closed loop process. It can be applied on cotton, cellulosics, wool and silk. 

Ever Dye*
ever dye has developed a novel dyeing process that includes a proprietary pretreatment in combination with natural pigments, that allows for dyeing at room temperature. The liquid pretreatment charges the surface of cellulosic fabrics/yarns negatively, enabling positively charged pigments that have been created out of minerals, nanocellulose extracted from vegetal waste and a positively charged proprietary organic molecule.

AN Herbals*
AN Herbals has developed a patented technology for extraction of powdered dyes from pharmaceutical (ayurvedic)/forest/food waste that allows dyeing of fabrics to be done without the use of any synthetic auxiliaries.


Image courtesy of Stony Creek Colors. 



Living Ink*
Living Ink transforms waste microalgae material into a bio-based carbon black that can replace petroleum derived carbon black. The pigment is jet black and UV stable. It can be used for screen printing on cotton, cellulosics, blends, leather and polyester. Dope dyeing applications are in Research & Development (R&D).

Algaeing uses microalgae to manufacture dyes and inks in a closed system that can be used with existing production machinery. It can be used to dye and print all types of fibre. 

What is the difference between microalgae and macroalgae?

Algae can be used as an input to create fibres and chemistries. It has received a lot of attention lately as products derived from algae have the potential to be carbon negative. Algae can be divided into two types; microalgae and macroalgae, the differences are explained below.




Nature Coatings*
Nature Coatings transforms Forest Steward Council (FSC) certified wood waste into high performing and cost competitive black pigments. Their pigments are a direct replacement for petroleum-based carbon black pigments. The pigments and 100% bio-based dispersions can be used for screen printing on cotton, cellulosics, blends, leather and polyester. Dope dyeing applications are in R&D.


Microbial pigments are either naturally occurring in organisms or artificially grown in genetically modified organisms (GMO). Once the naturally occurring microbe is identified or a genetically modified microbe strain has been engineered, the microbes get multiplied via fermentation by feeding them sugars and other feedstock. After this process the pigments are extracted to be used in traditional dyeing processes. Microbial pigments can replace synthetic pigments, and thereby reduce GHG emissions as well as the amount of potentially harmful chemistry used.

Colorfix uses microbial pigment technology to produce, deposit, and fix colour onto textiles. They genetically modify microbes to produce a wide range of naturally-occurring pigments and ferment them using renewable feedstocks. Instead of extracting the dye from bacteria through an expensive downstream processing step, Colorifix utilises the fermented broth of the bacteria as the dye liquor. This innovative technology allows for dyeing various types of fibres and fibre blends.

Huue uses microbial pigment technology to produce dyes and pigments, with indigo dye as its first product. After extracting the pigment from the bacteria and processing it, the bio-based dye can be used as a drop-in replacement for synthetic Indigo, with high purity and with the same performance. The pigments can be used to dye cotton fibres and any other substrates typically dyed with indigo.

Pili Bio*
Pili Bio uses microbial pigment technology to develop and produce bio based dyes and pigments. Their first commercially available product is indigo powder. In order to offer the same high-performance as fossil-based products, PILI combines fermentation and chemistry to produce drop-in dyestuff products with a biobased content ranging from 60% to 100%.

KBCols Sciences*
KBCols Sciences use microbial pigment technology, using non-GMO naturally occurring coloured microbes sourced from the soil, water and air, to extract different natural colours that can be applied in textiles and other applications. The pigments can be used to colour most natural and synthetic fibres.


There are many alternative more sustainable dyes and pigments on the market or in development. These include pigments made from captured carbon and recycled dyes made from old textiles.


Turning carbon emissions from industrial pollutants into industrial grade products. Using captured carbon as a feedstock means a shift away from synthetic chemistry as well as a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

Graviky Labs*
Graviky’s first product AIR-INK® is a range of inks and pigments made from end-of-use carbon emissions. The black pigment can be used for different printing processes such as screen, sublimation and digital. Graviky has tested AIR-INK on different surfaces such as paper, polyester and textiles. Dope dyeing applications are in R&D.

Farbenpunkt developed the patented PERACTO technology for dyeing and printing. The dyestuff is processed to a very small size with an average diameter of below 500 nanometers. These very small dye particles easily penetrate textile substrates colorising the surface and subsurface completely. The bond is both mechanical and chemical, effective on various textile materials and blends.


Recycled dyes can be generated in two ways. Firstly, by transforming textile waste into a finely crystallised powder and utilising it for dyeing purposes. Alternatively, dyes can be chemically recovered from pre- or post-consumer waste and then used to redye different fabrics. Employing textile waste as a feedstock not only decreases the reliance on synthetic chemistry but also enables a more circular process, promoting sustainability and reducing waste.

Officina +39 : Recycrom*
Recycrom is a range of dyestuff produced by transforming used clothing, fibrous materials, and textile scraps composed of cellulosic fibres into a highly refined powder suitable for dyeing. This dyestuff has the ability to colour various cellulosic and natural fibres, as well as polyamide.

DyeRecycle technology is a non-destructive separation technology of textile waste components: fibres & dyes, allowing their independent recycling back to the supply chain. The process selectively extracts dyes from waste fibres, and transfers the dyes to a new fabric. The liquid used for the process is recycled and reused, making the process fully circular by design.


Image courtesy of Algaeing. 


One of the biggest priorities of the fashion industry (and other industries) is finding PFC-free high performing durable water (and oil) repellency DW(O)R treatments. Instead of PFCs other synthetic chemistries (e.g. silicone) or bio-based solutions (e.g. waxes, wood, etc.) can be used. PFCs need to be phased out as they have proven to be toxic and harmful to both humans and the environment, so shifting to these alternative solutions has multiple environmental benefits.

OSM Shield: ZERO*
OSM Shield’s ZERO chemistry solution is a non-Perfluoroalkyls Substances (PFAS) high performance durable water and oil repellency technology which is free from all PFAS compounds and associated toxins. This chemistry technology will be available in a standard emulsion and can be applied using traditional application methods on all fibre types, but the focus is on cotton and polyester.

Dryfiber provides a completely fluorine-free, and hence also PFC-free DW(O)R textile finish. The solution is silicon-based and can be applied through traditional finishing processes. The current focus is on synthetic fabrics.


Image courtesy of OSM Shield.

PFC-free waterproof membrane:

A microporous membrane is a very thin layer containing many tiny pores (thousand times smaller than a drop of rain). These membranes have waterproof and breathable properties; while they do not let water come through from the outside, they do allow water vapour, emitted through perspiration, to evacuate. Innovation lies within the production technology to provide high performance without using PFCs.

Dimpora creates more sustainable, highly breathable and waterproof membranes. Based on polymers, the technology is PFC free and uses no Dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent. The company is further developing recyclable, bio-based and biodegradable membranes to close the loop for high performance gear. 

Lamoral develops fluorine-free and >50% bio-based A-Line DWR and other finishes. They use an emulsion polymerisation of a plant-based polyalkyl, anchoring the polymers onto the fibre. The non-bio-based content is based on acrylates in a water-based emulsion. Their DWR is called and holds the OEKO-TEX 100 certification and is ZDHC listed.

Beyond Surface Technology (BST)
BST develops products that reduce the impact of textile chemical finishes on the environment. The finishes are bio-based as e.g. microalgaes or plant seeds and branded miDori. Their DWR is called and holds the GOTS 5.0 certification and is ZDHC listed. Their raw materials are carefully sourced.

What is the difference between a DW(O)R finish and a waterproof membrane?
Both technologies are used in increasing the protective properties of garments, mostly focusing on shielding from water but also from dirt and oil. The technologies can be combined for optimal performance.

Overview of Coating vs. Membrane: 



Creating antimicrobial finishes with the use of antimicrobial polymeric materials (e.g. chitosan) derived from bio-based sustainable sources (e.g. flax or wood, crab or shrimp shell waste from seafood industry).

Nordshield creates antibacterial, antiviral, anti mould and insect repellent finishes based on waste from the forestry industry. Nordshield forms a physical barrier on surfaces treated with their finish and therefore prevents microbial growth at the sources. The finish can be applied to cotton, viscose and blends.



Finding innovations in chemistry with the same performance characteristics as traditional chemistry is challenging. If the performance of the more sustainable chemistry does not meet that of its traditional counterpart, it will in most cases not be adopted on a large scale. 

The supply chain for the chemical formulations currently available is well established and allows for large scale production, while the supply chain of more innovative formulations is less developed and does often not yet allow for large scale production Therefore, although performance on a pilot scale has been proven, it can sometimes still be timely and challenging to scale these new technologies. This can cause difficulties when working with brands and manufacturers as they need large quantities (in the thousands of tonnes) for mass adoption. One potential solution to this is for innovators to collaborate with established chemical manufacturers or toll blenders with large production capacities and expertise in scaling.

Given the low prices of most commodities used in this industry and the industry’s focus on economics, many sustainable alternatives struggle to present attractive business cases due to their higher costs. Tighter regulation could enable the industry to take into account the significant environmental externalities of current production processes.

Chemistries can be viewed as drop-in solutions which makes them easier to incorporate into the supply chain than for instance new machinery, this enhances their scalability. However, it also means that a supplier can easily switch to a competing chemistry even after integrating the original chemistry from an innovator.Therefore, the stickiness of chemistry solutions, both traditional and innovative, is believed to be low. This is troublesome for long-term security and survival, especially for innovators.

Current LCA (life cycle assessment) frameworks do not capture the full benefits of sustainable chemistry as they are focused on the consumption of e.g. carbon and water. However, the biggest advantage of more sustainable chemistries is that they are reducing toxicity and harmful chemistry, which is not captured in LCAs. Additionally, chemistry solutions often lead to downstream savings which are often not accounted for during LCA studies. Therefore, it is more difficult for chemistry innovators to effectively communicate about their impact and use impact as a factor to convince customers to adopt their technology. However, new upcoming regulations banning certain chemical compounds may help to overcome this challenge.


 1 Enzymes for biopreparation, Nozoymes.

 2 Source: Khan et al. (2018); FAO (2009), Usher et al. (2014), Campbell et al. (2019)

 3 Sources: Williams J. (2018), Loghin et al. (2018), Choudhry (2017)

* Fashion for Good Alumni – Fashion for Good have supported over 135 innovators through our projects and programmes. They continue to be a part of our alumni network with Fashion for Good providing continued ongoing support

Other Articles